Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Marco 68d7054557 Split e-invoice exports into a separate server-only subpath
@e-invoice-eu/core pulls in Node-only dependencies (tmp/tmp-promise, for
a LibreOffice conversion path this package never actually takes) that
broke Next.js's client bundle the moment renderInvoiceEInvoice() was
re-exported from the main "." entry — that entry is reachable from a
Client Component (email-templates.ts's Live Preview import chain), so
the bundler tried pulling e-invoice-eu/core in client-side too.

New "@einfach-produktiv/invoicing/einvoice" subpath (package.json
"exports" map + src/einvoice/index.ts) holds only the e-invoice
generation functions — server-only code (API routes, Server Components,
Payload job handlers) imports from there instead. The main "." entry
keeps everything already browser-safe (computeTaxBreakdown, formatters,
InvoiceDocument for Live Preview's <PDFViewer>, the plain PDF renderers).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-23 11:31:15 +00:00
Marco 63e3a02212 Phase 3: actual ZUGFeRD/Factur-X e-invoice generation
renderInvoiceEInvoice()/renderCorrectionInvoiceEInvoice() produce a
Factur-X-EN16931 hybrid PDF/A-3 (existing @react-pdf/renderer PDF +
embedded EN16931 XML) via @e-invoice-eu/core, instead of a plain PDF.
The plain renderInvoicePdf()/renderCorrectionInvoicePdf() stay unchanged
and are still what Live Preview uses — this only adds a post-processing
step for the actual send/download paths.

buildEInvoiceData()/buildCorrectionEInvoiceData() map InvoiceOrder/
CorrectionInvoiceOrder + InvoiceSeller into the library's raw UBL-shaped
Invoice object, reusing computeTaxBreakdown() for the tax math — one
implementation feeding both the human-readable and machine-readable side
of the same document. Verified end-to-end: rendered a sample invoice and
correction invoice, inflated the embedded XML stream out of the resulting
PDF/A-3 by hand (the library has no attachment-reading API to check
against), confirmed correct CrossIndustryInvoice XML, EN16931 guideline
reference, per-rate tax breakdown matching the order totals exactly, and
payment means with the IBAN from Phase 2 — not just "it didn't throw."

Found only through actually running it (not documented anywhere): every
EN16931 amount field requires a sibling `*@currencyID` key via the
library's runtime ajv validation, invisible in its TypeScript types.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-23 11:28:03 +00:00
Marco 4e9b4b9dd4 Add bankName back to InvoiceSeller, shown alongside IBAN/BIC
Dropped by accident when bankDetails split into iban/bic — a bank name
has no fixed format to validate, so it stays free text, but it's still
useful context next to the account numbers in the invoice footer.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-23 10:26:23 +00:00
Marco 62821ddc8a Phase 2: structured iban/bic instead of free-text bankDetails
InvoiceSeller.bankDetails becomes iban/bic (EN16931 wants discrete
PaymentMeans data, not a paragraph a human formatted by hand). The
footer's bank-details line also drops the misleading "(für Überweisung)"
qualifier — it was never actually conditional on the order's payment
method (only on whether the field was set at all), just worded as if it
were. Now shown whenever iban or bic is set, regardless of payment
method.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-23 10:06:12 +00:00
Marco 9336cfd0ba Initial commit: shared invoice/correction-invoice PDF generation
Consolidates code previously hand-duplicated between the einfach-produktiv
frontend and payload backend repos into one canonical implementation,
consumed as a git dependency by both instead of being kept in sync by eye.

While merging the two correction-invoice copies, found and fixed three
real drifts between them:
- variantName was silently dropped in the backend's emailed Stornorechnung/
  Gutschrift, but present in the frontend's re-download copy
- the backend's correction-invoice footer wasn't position:fixed, unlike
  the original invoice and the frontend's copy
- the backend used a numeric date format (03.07.2025) while the original
  invoice and the frontend's copy both used a spelled-out month (03. Juli
  2025) — a re-download didn't visually match what was emailed

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-23 08:33:12 +00:00