Move Netto below the MwSt annotation, not above it

Order was Gesamt → Netto → "enthält X% MwSt." — reads as if the
annotation describes Netto, which is backwards: Netto already has the
tax removed, Gesamt is what contains it. Reordered to Gesamt →
"enthält X% MwSt." → Netto so the annotation stays unambiguously
attached to the row it actually describes. Verified by re-rendering
and visually inspecting both the original invoice and a Storno.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

src/correctionInvoicePdf.tsx

@@ -337,15 +337,10 @@ function CorrectionInvoiceDocument({ kind, order, seller }: { kind: CorrectionIn
                 <Text style={styles.grandTotalLabel}>Gesamt</Text>
                 <Text style={styles.grandTotalValue}>-{formatPrice(grandTotal)}</Text>
               </View>
-              {/* Netto — same reasoning as invoicePdf.tsx's own row: a
-                  single well-defined figure (Gesamt minus every rate's own
-                  tax, summed) regardless of how many rates are present.
-                  Shown on every correction invoice (Storno and Gutschrift
-                  alike), not just non-exempt ones. */}
-              <View style={styles.nettoRow}>
-                <Text style={styles.summaryLabel}>Netto</Text>
-                <Text style={styles.summaryValue}>-{formatPrice(rateGroups.reduce((sum, g) => sum + g.net, 0))}</Text>
-              </View>
+              {/* Kept directly under Gesamt (not after Netto) — same
+                  ordering fix as invoicePdf.tsx: "enthält X% MwSt."
+                  describes Gesamt, not Netto (which has the tax already
+                  taken out), so it must not read as attached to Netto. */}
               <View style={styles.vatNotes}>
                 {order.vatExempt ? (
                   <Text style={styles.vatNoteLabel}>Steuerfreie innergemeinschaftliche Lieferung (§4 Nr. 1b UStG)</Text>
@@ -358,6 +353,15 @@ function CorrectionInvoiceDocument({ kind, order, seller }: { kind: CorrectionIn
                   ))
                 )}
               </View>
+              {/* Netto — same reasoning as invoicePdf.tsx's own row: a
+                  single well-defined figure (Gesamt minus every rate's own
+                  tax, summed) regardless of how many rates are present.
+                  Shown on every correction invoice (Storno and Gutschrift
+                  alike), not just non-exempt ones. */}
+              <View style={styles.nettoRow}>
+                <Text style={styles.summaryLabel}>Netto</Text>
+                <Text style={styles.summaryValue}>-{formatPrice(rateGroups.reduce((sum, g) => sum + g.net, 0))}</Text>
+              </View>
             </View>
           </View>
         </View>

src/invoicePdf.tsx

@@ -383,25 +383,17 @@ export function InvoiceDocument({ order, seller }: { order: InvoiceOrder; seller
                 <Text style={styles.grandTotalLabel}>Gesamt</Text>
                 <Text style={styles.grandTotalValue}>{formatPrice(order.total)}</Text>
               </View>
-              {/* Netto (Gesamt minus every rate's own tax, summed — a
-                  single well-defined figure regardless of how many
-                  distinct rates the order actually has) — businesses read
-                  this off the invoice directly for their own input-tax
-                  deduction instead of having to compute Gesamt minus MwSt
-                  by hand. Shown on every invoice, not just B2B/non-exempt
-                  ones — on a vatExempt order Netto and Gesamt happen to be
-                  the same figure (0% tax), but the row stays for layout
-                  consistency across every invoice this shop issues. */}
-              <View style={styles.nettoRow}>
-                <Text style={styles.summaryLabel}>Netto</Text>
-                <Text style={styles.summaryValue}>{formatPrice(rateGroups.reduce((sum, g) => sum + g.net, 0))}</Text>
-              </View>
               <View style={styles.vatNotes}>
                 {/* Exempt orders already have every item at 0% (see this
                     file's own InvoiceOrder.vatExempt comment) — "enthält
                     0% MwSt.: 0,00 €" would be a meaningless thing to print,
                     so this replaces the whole per-rate breakdown with the
-                    actual legal basis instead. */}
+                    actual legal basis instead. Kept directly under Gesamt
+                    (not after Netto) — "enthält X% MwSt." describes what's
+                    contained in Gesamt; sandwiching Netto between the two
+                    made it read as if Netto were what contained the tax,
+                    which is backwards (Netto is the figure with tax
+                    already taken out). */}
                 {order.vatExempt ? (
                   <Text style={styles.vatNoteLabel}>Steuerfreie innergemeinschaftliche Lieferung (§4 Nr. 1b UStG)</Text>
                 ) : (
@@ -413,6 +405,22 @@ export function InvoiceDocument({ order, seller }: { order: InvoiceOrder; seller
                   ))
                 )}
               </View>
+              {/* Netto (Gesamt minus every rate's own tax, summed — a
+                  single well-defined figure regardless of how many
+                  distinct rates the order actually has) — businesses read
+                  this off the invoice directly for their own input-tax
+                  deduction instead of having to compute Gesamt minus MwSt
+                  by hand. Shown on every invoice, not just B2B/non-exempt
+                  ones — on a vatExempt order Netto and Gesamt happen to be
+                  the same figure (0% tax), but the row stays for layout
+                  consistency across every invoice this shop issues. Placed
+                  last (after the MwSt annotation, not before it) — see
+                  that annotation's own comment above for why the order
+                  matters here. */}
+              <View style={styles.nettoRow}>
+                <Text style={styles.summaryLabel}>Netto</Text>
+                <Text style={styles.summaryValue}>{formatPrice(rateGroups.reduce((sum, g) => sum + g.net, 0))}</Text>
+              </View>
             </View>
             {paid && (
               <View style={styles.paidBadgeRow}>