Add Stripe payment processing (cards + PayPal) with a webhook-gated checkout flow

Checkout now branches on payment-methods.provider: Überweisung stays immediate/unchanged, Kreditkarte/PayPal creates a pending_payment order, mounts Stripe's Payment Element, and defers invoice/email to a webhook- verified confirm-payment call once the backend actually confirms payment. Includes a PAYMENT_TEST_MODE mock provider so the whole gated pipeline is exercisable locally without a real Stripe account. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-25 12:03:04 +00:00
parent bb3f94d39e
commit 740b791e5e
19 changed files with 941 additions and 70 deletions
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ import { normalizeVatId, isValidVatId } from "../../lib/vatId";
 import { checkVatIdViaVies } from "../../lib/vies";
 import { computeExemptTotals, destinationCountry, isExemptionEligibleCountry } from "../../lib/vatExemption";
 import { upsertNewsletterContact } from "../../lib/brevo";
+import { paymentProvider, isPaymentTestMode } from "../../lib/payments";

 // Plain float arithmetic on money (quantity × unitPrice summed across
 // lines, a percent discount, subtracting/adding those together) drifts
@@ -281,6 +282,35 @@ export async function POST(request: Request) {
  const finalShippingCost = exemptTotals?.shippingCost ?? shippingCost;
  const total = roundMoney(Math.max(0, finalSubtotal - discountAmount) + finalShippingCost);

+  // Gated-payment branch (Kreditkarte/PayPal today) — see
+  // spicy-leaping-pizza.md §3. The PaymentIntent is created BEFORE the
+  // order so its id can be persisted onto the order at creation time
+  // (providerReference), rather than needing a second authenticated
+  // update call that doesn't otherwise exist from this service. Stripe
+  // generates a PaymentIntent id independent of any order existing yet.
+  const requiresPayment = paymentMethod.provider === "stripe";
+  let providerReference: string | undefined;
+  let clientSecret: string | undefined;
+  if (requiresPayment) {
+    try {
+      const intent = await paymentProvider.createPaymentIntent({
+        amountCents: Math.round(total * 100),
+        currency: "eur",
+        customerEmail: body.email,
+        description: `einfach produktiv Bestellung — ${body.firstName} ${body.lastName}`,
+      });
+      providerReference = intent.providerReference;
+      clientSecret = intent.clientSecret;
+    } catch (err) {
+      sendCriticalAlert("Zahlung konnte nicht vorbereitet werden", {
+        customerEmail: body.email,
+        total,
+        error: String(err),
+      });
+      return NextResponse.json({ ok: false, reason: "Die Zahlung konnte gerade nicht vorbereitet werden." }, { status: 500 });
+    }
+  }
+
  const order = await createOrder({
    customerId: customer.id,
    customerFirstName: body.firstName,
@@ -317,6 +347,9 @@ export async function POST(request: Request) {
    discountCode: body.discountCode || null,
    discountAmount,
    total,
+    ...(requiresPayment
+      ? { status: "pending_payment" as const, paymentProvider: "stripe" as const, paymentStatus: "pending" as const, providerReference }
+      : {}),
  });
  if (!order) {
    // The worst-case failure in this whole flow: the customer went
@@ -334,68 +367,91 @@ export async function POST(request: Request) {
    return NextResponse.json({ ok: false, reason: "Bestellung konnte nicht gespeichert werden." }, { status: 500 });
  }

-  // Fire-and-forget — a failed confirmation email must never undo an
-  // already-successful order or block the response the customer is
-  // waiting on. Lower severity than the "order lost" alert above (the
-  // order itself is safe either way), but still worth knowing about, since
-  // it's the one thing that would otherwise fail completely silently.
-  sendOrderConfirmationEmail(
-    {
-      orderNumber: order.orderNumber,
-      createdAt: order.createdAt,
-      invoiceNumber: order.invoiceNumber,
-      invoiceIssuedAt: order.invoiceIssuedAt,
-      customerFirstName: body.firstName,
-      customerLastName: body.lastName,
-      companyName: body.companyName || undefined,
-      vatId: normalizedVatId,
-      vatExempt,
-      kleinunternehmer,
-      deliveryMethod: body.deliveryMethod,
-      street: body.street,
-      packstationNumber: body.packstationNumber,
-      postNumber: body.postNumber,
-      zip: body.zip,
-      city: body.city,
-      country: body.country,
-      hasDifferentShippingAddress: Boolean(body.hasDifferentShippingAddress),
-      shippingFirstName: body.shippingFirstName,
-      shippingLastName: body.shippingLastName,
-      shippingDeliveryMethod: body.shippingDeliveryMethod,
-      shippingStreet: body.shippingStreet,
-      shippingPackstationNumber: body.shippingPackstationNumber,
-      shippingPostNumber: body.shippingPostNumber,
-      shippingZip: body.shippingZip,
-      shippingCity: body.shippingCity,
-      shippingCountry: body.shippingCountry,
-      paymentMethodTitle: paymentMethod.title,
-      items: items.map((i) => ({
-        productName: i.productName,
-        quantity: i.quantity,
-        unitPrice: i.unitPrice,
-        imageUrl: i.imageUrl,
-        taxRatePercent: i.taxRatePercent,
-        bundleContents: i.bundleContents,
-        variantName: i.variantName,
-      })),
-      subtotal: finalSubtotal,
-      shippingCost: finalShippingCost,
-      discountAmount,
-      discountCode: body.discountCode || null,
-      total,
-    },
-    body.email,
-  ).catch((err) => {
-    sendCriticalAlert("Bestätigungs-Mail konnte nicht gesendet werden", {
-      orderNumber: order.orderNumber,
-      customerEmail: body.email,
-      error: String(err),
+  if (requiresPayment && providerReference) {
+    // Best-effort — see stripeProvider.attachOrderMetadata's own comment.
+    // Not fatal: the order's own `providerReference` field (already
+    // persisted above) remains the source of truth for the
+    // expirePendingPayments cleanup job either way; this only speeds up
+    // the webhook's fast path.
+    await paymentProvider.attachOrderMetadata(providerReference, { orderId: String(order.id), orderNumber: order.orderNumber }).catch((err) => {
+      sendCriticalAlert("Zahlungsmetadaten konnten nicht verknüpft werden", {
+        orderNumber: order.orderNumber,
+        providerReference,
+        error: String(err),
+      });
    });
-  });
+  }
+
+  // Deferred for gated payment methods (Kreditkarte/PayPal) until the
+  // webhook confirms payment — see spicy-leaping-pizza.md §3/§4. Sent
+  // from the backend's confirm-payment endpoint instead, at that point.
+  // Unchanged for Überweisung: fires immediately, exactly as before.
+  if (!requiresPayment) {
+    // Fire-and-forget — a failed confirmation email must never undo an
+    // already-successful order or block the response the customer is
+    // waiting on. Lower severity than the "order lost" alert above (the
+    // order itself is safe either way), but still worth knowing about, since
+    // it's the one thing that would otherwise fail completely silently.
+    sendOrderConfirmationEmail(
+      {
+        orderNumber: order.orderNumber,
+        createdAt: order.createdAt,
+        invoiceNumber: order.invoiceNumber as string,
+        invoiceIssuedAt: order.invoiceIssuedAt as string,
+        customerFirstName: body.firstName,
+        customerLastName: body.lastName,
+        companyName: body.companyName || undefined,
+        vatId: normalizedVatId,
+        vatExempt,
+        kleinunternehmer,
+        deliveryMethod: body.deliveryMethod,
+        street: body.street,
+        packstationNumber: body.packstationNumber,
+        postNumber: body.postNumber,
+        zip: body.zip,
+        city: body.city,
+        country: body.country,
+        hasDifferentShippingAddress: Boolean(body.hasDifferentShippingAddress),
+        shippingFirstName: body.shippingFirstName,
+        shippingLastName: body.shippingLastName,
+        shippingDeliveryMethod: body.shippingDeliveryMethod,
+        shippingStreet: body.shippingStreet,
+        shippingPackstationNumber: body.shippingPackstationNumber,
+        shippingPostNumber: body.shippingPostNumber,
+        shippingZip: body.shippingZip,
+        shippingCity: body.shippingCity,
+        shippingCountry: body.shippingCountry,
+        paymentMethodTitle: paymentMethod.title,
+        items: items.map((i) => ({
+          productName: i.productName,
+          quantity: i.quantity,
+          unitPrice: i.unitPrice,
+          imageUrl: i.imageUrl,
+          taxRatePercent: i.taxRatePercent,
+          bundleContents: i.bundleContents,
+          variantName: i.variantName,
+        })),
+        subtotal: finalSubtotal,
+        shippingCost: finalShippingCost,
+        discountAmount,
+        discountCode: body.discountCode || null,
+        total,
+      },
+      body.email,
+    ).catch((err) => {
+      sendCriticalAlert("Bestätigungs-Mail konnte nicht gesendet werden", {
+        orderNumber: order.orderNumber,
+        customerEmail: body.email,
+        error: String(err),
+      });
+    });
+  }

  // Fire-and-forget, same reasoning as the confirmation email above — a
  // failed marketing sync is not worth failing checkout over, and doesn't
  // even need a critical alert (nothing customer-facing depends on it).
+  // Not gated on payment confirmation — a newsletter signup intent isn't
+  // an order-fulfillment concern, unlike the confirmation email/invoice.
  if (body.newsletterOptIn) {
    upsertNewsletterContact(body.email, "checkout").catch(() => {});
  }
@@ -403,7 +459,22 @@ export async function POST(request: Request) {
  return NextResponse.json({
    ok: true,
    orderNumber: order.orderNumber,
+    orderId: order.id,
    orderDateIso: order.createdAt,
+    ...(requiresPayment
+      ? {
+          requiresPayment: true as const,
+          clientSecret,
+          testMode: isPaymentTestMode,
+          // Only surfaced in test mode — PaymentStep's "Testzahlung"
+          // buttons need it to call the test-confirm route directly,
+          // since there's no real Stripe redirect to carry it back
+          // through. A real PaymentIntent id isn't secret (only its
+          // client_secret is), but there's no reason to expose it to the
+          // client outside test mode either.
+          ...(isPaymentTestMode ? { providerReference } : {}),
+        }
+      : {}),
    shippingCost: finalShippingCost,
    paymentMethodTitle: paymentMethod.title,
    discountCode: body.discountCode || null,
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+import { NextResponse } from "next/server";
+import { getSessionCustomer, getCustomerOrderDetail } from "../../../lib/customerAuth";
+
+// Polled by /checkout/verarbeitung after a Payment Element redirect
+// returns — see spicy-leaping-pizza.md §3. Requires the customer's own
+// session (checkout is "Konto Pflicht", so one always exists by the time
+// this page is reachable) rather than accepting a bare orderNumber, so a
+// guessed/leaked order number can't be used to probe another customer's
+// payment status.
+export async function GET(request: Request) {
+  const session = await getSessionCustomer();
+  if (!session) return NextResponse.json({ ok: false, reason: "Bitte zuerst einloggen." }, { status: 401 });
+
+  const orderNumber = new URL(request.url).searchParams.get("orderNumber");
+  if (!orderNumber) return NextResponse.json({ ok: false, reason: "orderNumber fehlt." }, { status: 400 });
+
+  const order = await getCustomerOrderDetail(session.token, session.customer.id, orderNumber);
+  if (!order) return NextResponse.json({ ok: false, reason: "Bestellung nicht gefunden." }, { status: 404 });
+
+  return NextResponse.json({ ok: true, status: order.status, paymentStatus: order.paymentStatus });
+}